understanding_the_gcode_z_offset
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| understanding_the_gcode_z_offset [2025/09/20 16:34] – dshoop | understanding_the_gcode_z_offset [2025/10/14 19:31] (current) – [Setting and calibrating the gcode z offset] dshoop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| === General concepts of squish and non-tangential shape === | === General concepts of squish and non-tangential shape === | ||
| + | |||
| + | (wip) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Generally speaking an otherwise uninfluenced extrusion from the nozzle will have a circular cross section. If an extruded line is placed next to another extruded line which each have a circular cross section they only tangentially connect. It will also only tangentially connect with the plate resulting in very poor adherence. A more rectangular cross section is desirable for maximal surface area connection. By adjusting the layer height very slightly we can control this shape and it will become more " | ||
| + | |||
| + | If we don't have good surface area connection in the extrusion lines the print will also be very weak and fall part on the layers. | ||
| + | |||
| === Squish will be different for different layer heights === | === Squish will be different for different layer heights === | ||
| + | |||
| === Squish will be different for different filaments === | === Squish will be different for different filaments === | ||
| + | |||
| * Material | * Material | ||
| * type | * type | ||
| Line 61: | Line 70: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| - | ==== Calibrating | + | ===== Determining and calibrating |
| Follow the procedure described in [[how_should_i_set_the_z_offset_to_adjust_nozzle_height|How should I set the z offset]]. | Follow the procedure described in [[how_should_i_set_the_z_offset_to_adjust_nozzle_height|How should I set the z offset]]. | ||
| Line 70: | Line 79: | ||
| At best the paper method will asymptotically approach the thickness of the paper being used. Yet this is an arbitrary value nearly in the ball park of what a typical z offset might be. The z offset we're seeking is filament dependent and will vary by the filament being used. We're seeking a correct affect on the shape of the extrusion' | At best the paper method will asymptotically approach the thickness of the paper being used. Yet this is an arbitrary value nearly in the ball park of what a typical z offset might be. The z offset we're seeking is filament dependent and will vary by the filament being used. We're seeking a correct affect on the shape of the extrusion' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The same logic applies to using [[why_not_feeler_gauges|feeler gauges]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related Topics ===== | ||
| === Is the CC setting the z offset or setting the probe z offset? === | === Is the CC setting the z offset or setting the probe z offset? === | ||
/app/data/attic/understanding_the_gcode_z_offset.1758400482.txt.gz · Last modified: by dshoop
